Aurangzeb
Aurangzeb
Alamgir (“World Conqueror”) ascended the throne in 1658 after getting rid of
all the competitors for the throne, Dara Shukoh, Shuja and Murad, in a war of
succession. His reign of fifty years falls into two equal parts. During the
first twenty-five years he resided in the north, chiefly at Delhi, and
personally occupied himself with the affairs of northern India, leaving the
Deccan in the hands of his viceroys. Around 1681 he was prompted by the rebellion
of one of his sons, Prince Akbar, to go to the Deccan. He never returned to
Delhi, dying disappointed at Ahmad Nagar in 1707.
Aurangzeb conducted several military campaigns to
extend the frontiers of the Mughal empire. His wars in the northwest and northeast
drained the treasury. Already under his father, the revenue of the crops had
been raised from a third to a half, and the extensive and the prolonged
military campaigns he waged required him to keep the peasantry heavily taxed.
Aurangzeb retained Shah Jahanabad as his capital, but after some two decades
the capital was shifted to wherever Aurangzeb would set up camp during his long
military campaigns.
In the north
there were three major uprisings against Aurangzeb. The Jats (Mathura
district), the Satnamis (Haryana region), and the Sikhs rebelled against
Aurangzeb. The Jat rebellion (1669), a constant feature even during the reign
of Jahangir and Shah Jahan, was crushed temporarily but they remained restive
even after the death of Aurangzeb. The Satnamis revolt was crushed with the
help local Hindu zamindars. The Sikh (The Punjab) rebellion erupted due to the
political intrigues of Ram Rai, a claimant for the position of Sikh Guru,
against the incumbent Guru Tegh Bahadur. This finally ended with the execution
of Guru Tegh Bahadur, the ninth Sikh Guru.
Aurangzeb’s decision that the jizya (poll tax) should
be levied on Hindus of all classes agitated the chiefs of Rajasthan, who had
until then served the empire faithfully. The death of Jaswant Singh of Marwar
brought about a succession issue. The Rajput queen Rani Hadi, wife of Raja
Jaswant Singh, resented the move of Aurangzeb to install Indra Singh, a
grandnephew of Jaswant Singh, a titular chief of the state. This led to a
revolt with the help of Rathor Rajputs, but was effectively put down. The Rana
of Mewar, Rana Raj Singh, resenting the interference of Aurangzeb in the
affairs of Marwar rose in revolt and he was supported by Prince Akbar, the
rebellious son of Aurangzeb. However, the Rana could not match the Mughal
forces and fought a guerrilla warfare till his death in 1680. In 1681 Rana Jai
Singh, the new Rana of Mewar, signed a peace treaty with Aurangzeb.
Aurangzeb’s Deccan Policy
The Deccan
policy of Aurangzeb was motivated by the policy of containing the growing
influence of the Marathas, the rebellious attitude of the Shia kingdoms of
Deccan like Golkonda and Bijapur and to curtail the rebellious activities of
his son Akbar who had taken refuge in the Deccan. Aurangzeb came to the Deccan
in 1682 and remained in the Deccan till his death in 1707. The Adil Shahi ruler
Sikkandar Adil Shah of Bijapur resisted the different forces sent by Aurangzeb.
Aurangzeb first sent his son Azam Shah (1685) but to no avail. Then he sent
another son, Shah Alam to capture Bijapur. Though Bijapur Sultan, a Shia
Muslim, ably defended the fort, he lost in the end, because Aurangzeb himself
entered the battlefield and inspired his forces to fight to the finish.
Golkonda was captured in 1687 after defeating the ruler Abul Hasan.
Against Marathas
The Marathas under Shivaji were a threat to
Aurangzeb. Aurangzeb sent two of his great generals Shaista Khan and Jai Singh
one after the other to capture Shivaji. Jai Singh captured Shivaji and took him
to Delhi but Shivaji managed to escape to the Deccan. Shivaji, employing
guerrilla tactics, defied the Mughal forces till his death at the age of 53 in
1680. Aurangzeb was severely tested by the Marathas till his death in 1707 as
the sons of Shivaji continued the rebellion. The death of Aurangzeb in 1707
marked a watershed in Indian history as the Mughal empire virtually came to end
even though the weak successors of Aurangzeb held the throne the next 150
years.
Aurangzeb nursed a grudge against the Sikhs for
having supported his brother and principal rival to the throne, Dara Shukoh.
Guru Tegh Bahadur, was killed at Aurangzeb’s command. In 1680 Aurangzeb sent a
formidable army under his son Akbar to subdue the rebellious Rajput kings, but
the emperor had not reckoned with his son’s traitorous conduct. Akbar, had
declared himself the emperor, but was compelled to flee to the Deccan, where he
enlisted the help of Shivaji’s son, Sambhaji. Aurangzeb decided to take to the
field himself, and eventually drove his own son into exile in Persia. Sambhaji
was captured in 1689 and executed. The Sultanates of Bijapur and Golkonda were
also reduced to utter submission.
Towards the end of his reign, Aurangzeb’s empire
began to disintegrate and this process was accelerated in the years after his death,
when “successor states” came into existence. The empire had become too large
and unwieldy. Aurangzeb did not have enough trustworthy men at his command to
manage the more far-flung parts of the empire. Many of his political appointees
broke loose and declared themselves independent. Aurangzeb’s preoccupation with
affairs in the Deccan prevented him from meeting political challenges emanating
from other parts of the empire. Shortly after the death of Aurangzeb, the
Mughal empire ceased to be an effective force in the political life of India.
Aurangzeb re-imposed jizya. He also issued orders that new
temples should not be constructed; but the repair of old long-standing temples
was permitted. These measures were rooted not only in his religious faith but
also due to political compulsions. Jizya had been levied for a long time in
India. As a staunch Muslim, Aurangzeb had discontinued the practise of levying abwab,
a tax levied on the lands over and above the original rent, not sanctioned by
Shariah. Likewise, the order on temples was also an older one which in practice
applied to places where he had political adversaries. In areas where there was
no political insubordination, Aurangzeb provided endowments to build temples.
It should be noted that during the reign of Aurangzeb the number of Hindu
officials increased when compared to the reign of Shah Jahan.
Comments
Post a Comment